Language · · 2 min read

The Em, Am, Erm...

The Am Dash, a counter point to the Em dash as an arbiter of quality writing by humans.

The notion that em dashes (— not -) are a tell for AI-generated text is a common misconception although it could probably be argued that LLMs in their infancy have had a marked propensity to use them with greater frequency than the majority of human writers.

As large language models have evolved and iterated to allow for tonal and cadence changes based on user prompts, these can be eliminated to accommodate different writing styles so I'd argue that as an indicator, their significance is overblown.

I came across Am Dash this week and while I'm not sure I'd go so far as to claim that we are entrenched in some form of holy war, there is a volume of functional copywriting that AI is definitely consuming or perhaps rendering as 'good enough'. It's an interesting accent of resistance to signify human craft skill.

The battle for the soul of writing is in full swing. And the human fightback starts here. With a new punctuation mark that serves as a symbol of real pondering, genuine daydreaming, and true editorial wordsmithery. Inspired by Descartes’ belief that thinking makes us human, the am dash is a small but powerful testament that the words you’ve painstakingly and poetically pulled together are unequivocally, certifiably, and delightfully your own.

I wonder if the notion of 'Made by Humans' will transform the cloying whimsy and saccharine sweet humanising elements of the Live, Laugh, Love variety beloved of niche agencies into a genuine imprimatur of quality.

Do I care that AI wrote an SEO friendly excerpt for my post? Not really. Did you notice? Probably not.

The Am Dash

Read next

Bi-confused?
Language ·

Bi-confused?

The perpetual confusion and vagaries of bi-weekly and bi-monthly as terms to confuse and confound.